
Some areas really miss
tariffs
October 3, 2003
BY JANE REGAN
Special to The Herald
PORT-AU-PRINCE . Chicken and rice. Sounds healthy enough. But
in Haiti, where free trade has turned into a free-for-all, tons of cheap U.S.
rice and poultry have proven very unhealthy for local producers.
Haiti, the hemisphere's poorest nation, with a per capita
income of less than $1 a day, is also home to the hemisphere's most open
market. Neighboring Caribbean countries protect their chicken and rice farmers with 40 percent tariffs,
but foreign agribusinesses pay no more than a 5 percent tariff at Haitian
ports.
Port-au-Prince's huge Croix Bossale outdoor market was named
after the hundreds of thousands of bossale or untamed African slaves sold there
during the colonial era. Just like yesterday's human cargo, almost everything
for sale there today comes off a boat.
Labyrinths lead through a chaotic jumble of sacks of U.S.
rice, beans and corn meal, many decorated with the Stars and Stripes. Street
vendors shoo flies from the piles of chicken, pork and turkey parts, all from
the United States. Cast-offs from the north and brand-new Panamanian shirts and
pants are stacked next to Dominican cooking oil,
Guatemalan sugar, Venezuelan cookies and Italian tomato paste.
PRICE OF SECURITY
Haiti can't blame its low import tariffs Š today between zero
and 15 percent Š on any regional trade agreement. It was part of the deal
President Jean-Bertrand Aristide made with the International Monetary Fund
(IMF), Washington and other aid donors on the eve of his return to office in
1994 following three years of military rule.
U.S. soldiers would guarantee security, Aristide was told,
but financial security came at a price. The donors and lenders would open the
money spigots only when the economy opened up: privatize state-owned
industries, float the currency, the gourde, and cut import tariffs.
"It was a must,'' said Marie Michelle Rey, then minister
of Finance and now head of the
government office that coordinates with the 15-member Caribbean Community, the
World Trade Organization (WTO) and the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas
(FTAA). "If you donÕt have an agreement with the IMF, youÕre dead in the
water. You canÕt do anything.''
Eight years later, a lot of farmers are "dead in the
water'' too.
"Directly and indirectly, when the chicken industry shut
down, we lost 10,000 jobs,'' said a member of Haiti's now-defunct Agricultural
Producers Association who spoke on condition of anonymity. "By 1998, it
was all over.''
At its height, Haiti's chicken agribusiness hatched 6 million
eggs a year and bought thousands of tons of local corn. But suddenly the
country opened itself to the cheap dark chicken and turkey meat that finicky Americans
wonet buy. No tariffs, no quotas, no subsidies to local producers. American
companies sold more than $17 million worth of
poultry and parts here last year alone.
Haiti's chicken industry went beak-up.
GROWER RUINED
"I used to work there,'' said the grizzled DieudonnI
Pierre, 53, as he peered through the
locked gate at some of the 70 buildings in Thomazeau, 20 miles east of
Port-au-Prince,
that were part of two poultry plants. Once full of clucking broilers, now they
host only
dust and rats. "Now I make charcoal and grow some sorghum during the rainy
season,'' he said.
At her table under a broken beach umbrella in the Croix
Bossale marketplace, Olide Eloie, 36, is happy to sell the American
"second-hand chicken,'' as it is commonly called.
"They sell better than Haitian chicken,'' she said,
batting big black flies away from
the piles of pink legs. "I can sell a [44-pound] case in a day.''
A Haitian chicken sells for about $5.50, but the same weight
of U.S. chicken parts
sells for less than $2.50.
PRICED OFF MARKET
The same goes for rice. Six pounds of Haitian rice sells for
between $1.70 and $3, but
the American product known here as "Miami Rice'' is $1.45. Imports of U.S.
rice have doubled since 1995, to 200,000 metric tons per year, making Haiti one
of U.S. growers' best customers.
"Haitian rice just can't compete,'' acknowledged
economist Henri Bazin, who heads the Haitian Economists Association.
"Liberalization happened here overnight. All of a sudden. Maybe it was too
brutal.''
Rey defends Haities slashing of tariffs by saying the
government had no choice, and that anyway lower tariffs mean lower prices.
"The consumer wins,'' Rey said.
But only if market prices are in fact lower. In Haiti, they are
not really. As Haiti's
economy ground to a halt over the past eight years, in part because the
agricultural sector stagnated, the country's currency lost two-thirds of its
value. That means chicken and rice cost about the same today as they did in 1995.
And only if consumers are buying. With a contracting economy,
nearly half the population malnourished and some 2.4 million people living in
extreme poverty, chances are most Haitians aren't buying a lot of chicken and
rice.
To the contrary, Bazin noted, cheap imports and the
governmentes failure to support peasant farmers is driving them off the land
and into the cities' burgeoning slums.
Bazin believes free trade can benefit countries that plan
right, but, he noted, "You
can't compete if you don't produce.''